Thanks, but I already assumed this, but it’s not helping me to figure out the connection 
I loved it!
I tried to do it yesterday and it was so frustrating.
But today I had it clear in my mind and finally beat it.
Thanks to whoever made this puzzle.
This puzzle it’s awesome.
Hope it’s not a to big of a spoiler but : CENSURED :-))))
If I submit it seems not all tests succeed, but in simulation they do. I don’t find the reason.
I got 1606 points.
// admin edit don’t spoil the puzzle
How do people get such high scores ?
Also is the offer still valid ? No point for me to do all this if it’s for nothing. 
Wow, after another attempt i went straight to 2618 points. To think that my main issue was that i was trying to predict too much, and a more “simple” solution worked wonders.
Now I really need to know if the offer is still valid. 
Hi,
Back in the days, we could see the seeds for IDE test-cases. We cannot anymore, even though this information is part of the reverse-engineering process.
Could you please provide us with the IDE seeds ? It is a crucial piece of information imo.
Thanks
1 Like
No, sorry
Allowing players to test custom configurations on games with a viewer generated too many errors on our side. That’s why we removed it.
1 Like
Hi,
I’m not asking to re-enable the option to test custom seeds. I’m asking to just have the seeds, as text. That’s already enough to pursue the process locally.
In C, the default code is wrong! Probably the input has been change, but the default code that reads the stdin wasn’t.
When is this due? The “Reverse Engineering” challenge?
Thank you so much! Looking at that nonsense debug output, I had almost assumed the puzzle was too cryptic for me, I didn’t even think that the newline treatment of input in the default code could be wrong.
I am getting a strange timeout error while waiting for the input. I modified my input function (I am using python3) to print to stderr at the same time that I receive inputs. The timeout always occurs while waiting for the last pair of integers in the loop.
I’m assuming that there’s nothing I could have done in the previous turn that would have broken the stream of inputs in the next turn, but maybe that’s a bad assumption?
Edit:
Meant to add that this timeout does not occur on the first turn. It always occurs on the same turn for the same scenario (e.g. turn 82 for M1L1). There doesn’t seem to be any pattern to when it occurs in regards to the rest of the inputs.
Edit2:
I fixed an error in my BFS and now I no longer get the error. I can’t for the life of me how the BFS error affected the timing of receiving inputs, but I’m just glad it’s gone.
Doing B C D E over and over again is fun
got around 1000 points
I might be a little late, but since i didn’t see any answer in this thread:
Douglas Adams wrote the HitchHicker’s Guide to the Galaxy, also known as H2G2 (note the capitalized letters in the title), (Le Guide du Voyageur Intergalactique en francais).
The whole thing revolves around an answer given by Deep Thought, the biggest, most powerful super computer they have. It is supposed to be the answer to “Life, the Universe and everything else”. Its answer, after years, decades of computing ? 42.
The problem they’re facing is that no one knows the exact question which it answers, not even Deep Thought.
Here, you’re in pretty much the same situation: You have the answers, but it’s your job to figure out the questions.
If you’re stuck, you can always ask the mice or the dolphins.
1 Like
And Le guide du routard galactique before a trial.
Naaaaaah !!! Z’êtes vaches !
Je souffre sur ce code 
question qui ne devrait pas être un spoiler : le nombre d’itération de départ (qui est variable d’un lancement à l’autre) de chaque test influence le score ?
Hi everyone, this is my first time trying to reverse engineer a code and i m facing a big challenge in understanding how can output of a code vary with same inputs?
for test set M1L1 and M2L1, provided inputs are exactly same right from first_init_input to sixth_input everything and I am moving my character same for both test cases but the output score and number of output lines is different for both.
Could someone please help me understand this part without giving away further details or spoilers?
TIA
That is happening because the initial data and the first turn information read is the same… But in the rest of the turns the info read changes
The screen that is displayed with classified, does that actually match what is happening or is it just something random.
E.g. While I output values, it sometimes will display a test signal, go back to find what frames it is on and the test signal is not there.