Coding Games and Programming Challenges to Code Better
Send your feedback or ask for help here!
Created by @Lisa-Has-Ideas,validated by @Arglanir,@cedricdd and @Biglover.
If you have any issues, feel free to ping them.
1 Like
Good puzzle!
One of the few GOOD GEMS here, unfortunately, hard to imagine this one being classified as EASY, considering the fact that this one requires the following additional requirements: (took 1.5hrs to get em all right…)
- Pattern observation using the 2 given short string
- Explicit handling of no wrap-around for letters
- Only display the 31x31 upper-left section of the grid if oversized
Whilst this one with much less variation → Coding Games and Programming Challenges to Code Better is ranked as MEDIUM.
Worth mentioning in constraints that each of the 2 pattern string will always start with an UPPERCASE letter, followed by a non-negative integer / positive integer (not sure if such cases are valid 0A 1B)
I am fucked.
I pass all the normal tests, but fail validators 11, 16 and 24.
I don’t know where to start debugging, anyone has idea about what’s special in these validators?
Validator 11: Also “topLeft clockwise”, the same as Test 11. “F3” and “I” become something else but still very close. 7 and 6 become a 2-digit and a 3-digit integer respectively.
Validator 16: Still “clockwise”, the same as Test 16, but not “topRight” this time. 11 becomes a bigger 2-digit integer, 30 becomes a 1-digit integer, and 70 becomes a smaller 2-digit integer.
Validator 24: Still “topLeft”, the same as Test 24, but not “counter-clockwise” this time. 201 becomes a smaller 3-digit integer, 1000 becomes a 2-digit integer, and 989 becomes a much smaller 3-digit integer.
Nice puzzle ! but definitly not an easy one.