This is a very good point, it’s a massive pain in the neck especially in clashes, as you have to go through removing whitespace, and periodically check that you haven’t accidentally deleted some important code, and if you decide you want to edit it then good luck!
Is there any way to post comments to the devs to suggest this?
ha, I feel the same way! I was very happy with my code size of 171 until I noticed someone did it with 63… Have you figured what the method is they used?
Lots of people talk about using the “system” function. Without further details on this, for me, it looks like remote code execution of some kind or evaluating (shorter than python) bash code? Cool that they have ~60 char codes… But it’s totally misses the point.
Damn … I’m stuck at 106 Char in Python3 …
I think for future improvements I’ll have to review my algorithm.
So far I map the input as int to 4 variables, then in a loop check the coordinates one by one to generate a string and print it.
Any hint on how to get shorter ? A bunch a people are around 80-90, so I guess it must be doable. (I’ve already ignored North since its not tested)
Any tips please…
My code size is 61 in JS, and i have no idea how to reduce it… but i find results as good as 58 ! How!?
Is it possible to use something shorter than “readline” or “print”?
Hi all, I did it with 103 chars using PHP (and PHP is a bad language to codegolf) but then I saw someone that did it with 62…It’s a big diference so… I guess I’ll need a tip on how to get the input the shortest way possible with PHP.
Hello Approxit! I hope to stir your curiocity. Seems that 96 is possible with Python3 without using “system”. Or “hardcoding”, whatever it is. Use of “while 1:statement1;statement2;…” construct will help