Community contributions and moderation

General
1

A few hours ago, there was a rather heated discussion on french chat regarding the community contributions and its moderation system.

This is the opportunity for me to remind a few important things:

  1. We are aware that the contribution system is not perfect. We’d like to tackle its inconsistencies and improve it but it is, right now, not part of our short-term plans.
    We’re working on other topics such as the Coding Escape project, the events of the week feature and the Spring Challenge.
    If you’d like to report an issue with a contribution, feel free to do it on Discord or here in the forum to one of the chat moderators or me directly.
  2. Everyone has different expectations regarding the quality of contributions on CodinGame. The moderator’s role is not to apply their vision to a contribution but to help and ensure a positive and constructive discussion towards the improvement of the contribution.
    If a contribution of subpar quality happens to be accepted, this is not a big problem. It can still be updated by moderators, removed automatically by the bot or dealt with by CG staff.
  3. You have the right to be angry at how we managed things at CG but any disrespectful comment to another member of CodinGame or to a member of CG staff is unacceptable. I’ll refer you to our Code of Conduct.
    We reserve ourselves the right to ban any member who will not respect these rules.
40 Likes
5

Hello, I have a question about contributions. Can I choose a programming language for rating and commenting? I write a little Java, but I don’t understand C or Python at all. I hope you understand the essence of my question :slight_smile: Thanks in advance

6 Likes
6

Can Users join

3 Likes
7

no, no you can not

3 Likes
11

I’ve been following the recent discussion about contributions and moderation on CodinGame, and I think both sides brought up valid points.

The contribution system definitely has some inconsistencies, and it can be frustrating when people have different expectations about what should be accepted or rejected. At the same time, the moderators explained that they’re currently focused on other projects and that the system isn’t their top priority right now.

One thing I do agree with is that feedback should stay constructive. It’s completely fine to criticize decisions or point out problems, but discussions become less productive when they turn disrespectful toward moderators, staff, or other users.

Overall, I think this situation shows how difficult it can be to manage a community-driven platform. Everyone wants better quality and fairness, but respectful communication is still the most important part of making improvements happen.

1 Like