Coding Games and Programming Challenges to Code Better
Send your feedback or ask for help here!
Created by @NicknamedTwice,validated by @Stef_3,@Harry.B,@Delicious31415 and @DeanTheMachine.
If you have any issues, feel free to ping them.
1 Like
Great puzzle.
I think it would be nice to have the test case n=0.
hi there are a case that are not in the tests for the ide but in the validators . in the validators 5 and 11 it can failed because a numerical precision.
Could you clarify why there would be a numerical precision issue here? As far as I can see, it’s possible to solve the puzzle without relying on any division, which should avoid precision problems.
Continuing the discussion from [Community Puzzle] Button Mash - Puzzle discussion
for the button mash
coding that generate a numerical precision problem in the validator 5 and 11.
the problem come with the use type double because i used the log2 and after pow.
You don’t have to use log2 or pow to solve the puzzle.
i fixed the problem in using log2 and pow and completed the puzzle 100%. i claim just that the test 5 and 11 don’t are as the validator 5 and 11 that can generate numerical precision problem.
you solved it using some formula?
No formula involved.
and you did not use division?
That’s right.