Can a supermoderator edit my puzzle and add in its description that the number of animals is the first input?
Thank you.
The change occurred just when I was validating my solution ^^ For a few minutes, I wondered why my asserts were now triggered
So did someone change this after the puzzle went live? My solution no longer works. Anyway, the example is still wrong:
Input
Rabbits Chickens
Heads 5
Legs 14
This is interesting since the example is auto-generated from the puzzle submission. Anyway, if there’s a variable [[n]] at the beginning of the input, then the Example should be modified.
- danBhentschel
Hi,
Could someone give a guess about the submit testcase #1? The IDE tests are all fine and submit 2-4 are also. I don’t know what did I miss.
Many thanks in advance,
Adam
Maybe the inverse of the determinant is not decimal. I don’t know.
Could you please give me some more details to help me recreate the problem?
Thanks,
Adam
Maybe you did not have the exact values.
When I developed this puzzle, the first bugs I had were these ones.
Note that my solution doesn’t use an algebra library, I coded it myself.
Well, i have coded a matrix solver, because these only have one exact solution vector. So with Gauss elimination it can be reduced to a unit matrix. I can’t see where the problem is, it even gives good answer when the numbers of the parts are not provided correctly.
Oh, where?
No, it’s not in IDE testcases, I created some myself.
Should I post my code? Because this seems like unfindable for me.
You can send it to me.
I cant send you message… To be honest I cant send one to noone… It says “Topic can’t be empty”, but I fill the topic field… How can I send it to you?
Thanks,
Adam
No, I don’t have that button, maybe my trust level does not work. Can you send me a message? I hope they let me answer you:)
Thanks,
Adam
Hi everyone, I pass all tests in IDE but fail the third and fourth when submitting.
I’m using Gauss but I really don’t know where I’m wrong…
Can someone give me an advice ?
Thanks,
Maybe your GauĂź method is wrong.
The testcases are so small that really, any solution should do the trick, provided it is correct.
Which is a good thing imo.
I had it solved by bruteforcing, then adopted a Cramer’s rule solution.
superior or equal instead of superior…
What?
You mean â©˝?