I believe there is nothing else as annoying as these little editor misbehavings.
One moans about the settings the other one is displeased with a lack of a feature (or a config, or … - just search for ‘editor’). An editor is very personal choice and I feel frustrated when being deep into something, the editor doesn’t work as I am used to.
Now, solution:
There is no chance, that any CG editor will fulfill the expectation. My suggestion is to give it up and instead, please make a nice API. There are some smart people here who could make use of that and provide us with “a bridge”, “a proxy”.
Yes, I did. I was fighting with it for a while and I guess I will give it a try again.
That’s exactly what I meant - a proxy made by community to accessing CG from one favorite editor locally.
Well, maybe I should shut up and let @Jasperr rate CG API.
I agree with @JBM on this one. Although the editor API is not documented and it requires the combination of an extension and a locally running application to perform actions on the local filesystem, it does exist and it works fine at the moment.