Puzzle quality

It’s fascinating to see how often a puzzle is published without any follow up by the creator.
Bad descriptions and bad validators are common.
They must be explained by other users trying to compensate for the creator’s lack of participation.
Why was the puzzle approved?

Things go wrong, as they always do. All the time.
So no big deal, but when there’s no will to fix it, I think it’s a problem.

Bad descriptions and bad validators are common.
Why was the puzzle approved?

CG needs more people like you who can have opinions on what’s good and what’s bad, and cast your opinion on the pool of potential puzzles, raise issues before they are approved and got very bad ones to be disapproved.

1 Like